You might have to go through the Nerve Burning procedure, also known as Radiofrequency Ablation or RFA if you are terrified of chronic pain. But first, weigh the benefits and drawbacks of nerve burning before scheduling a consultation with your doctor about RFA.

A surgical procedure called radiofrequency ablation, which burns nerve tissue in part to block body nerve impulses, is used to treat nerve damage. RFA also referred to as nerve ablation, is a painless procedure that blocks pain signals and lessens discomfort in a specific area of your body. Many people disagree with it, despite the fact that it is scientifically safe.

Things You Need to Know About Nerve Burning Or RFA

By inserting a catheter into the affected area under ultrasound guidance, the RFA or Nerve Burning procedure is carried out. The tissue is then destroyed using heat.

It needs local anesthesia, which involves numbing your tissues, to be effective. There are no adverse effects from the procedure other than the patient experiencing less pain when the catheter enters and exits the body.

To lessen this discomfort, patients are given intravenous painkillers and muscle relaxants. To lessen this discomfort, patients are given intravenous painkillers and muscle relaxants.

Because it is a safe procedure with few risks, it is frequently carried out as an outpatient procedure, allowing for same-day discharge for the patients. The patient must continue to be directly under the care of a doctor, though, if general anesthesia is required for some reason.

There is damage, which prevents the pain signals from reaching your brain. In contrast, the nerve frequently makes an attempt to regenerate. If it does, the effects are usually temporary and last between 6 and 9 months.

Pros of Nerve Burning

Surgery Pain is Reduced

Patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation are less likely than those undergoing chemical sympathectomy to experience severe pain during surgery.

This is because RFA treatments only target the ganglion neurons that transmit pain signals along nerves in a particular location.

Pain Relief

A pain reduction that lasted up to two years was reported by 85% of patients after an average of 4 to 6 months. Six different studies revealed that two years after receiving RFA or nerve burning therapy, 56% of patients reported less pain. On the other hand, 50% of patients who underwent chemical sympatheticectomy experienced long-term success.

Minimally Invasive Procedure

RFA is a non-surgical outpatient procedure that can be carried out under local anesthetic alone or with intravenous sedation. Most patients can go back to work a week after surgery with this treatment option, which usually only requires two to four sessions.

Research indicates that although nerve-burning technology is safe and only slightly invasive, it is still developing.

You Can Quickly Recover from Pain

In contrast to some procedures, RFA doesn’t necessitate months of recovery, and the majority of patients can resume their normal activities in a lot less time. Because no incisions are required during the surgery, this approach
decreases the risk of infection.

Furthermore, the risk of damaging any major blood arteries is minimized by imaging techniques like ultrasound scans and fluoroscopy X-rays.

Healing Issues at the Scalpel Entry Site

An incision is not required with RFA. It lessens the likelihood of post-operative stiffness and pain, as well as scarring or other types of skin irritation where the needle was inserted into the body.

This is one of the most notable advantages of nerve-burning therapy for people who are afraid of injections and incisions.

The Procedure With a Low Risk of Complications

RFA is carried out in an outpatient setting while the patient is under local anesthesia, either by itself or in conjunction with sedatives administered intravenously. The majority of patients can return to work in as little as one week after having this procedure, which typically only requires two to four appointments.

Nerve burning is a minimally invasive procedure that is safe and technologically developing.

Less Postoperative Discomfort

When compared to patients who undergo chemical sympathectomy, those who undergo radiofrequency ablation are less likely to feel extremely uncomfortable throughout the procedure.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency ablation therapies only target the local ganglion neurons that are responsible for sending pain signals through the local nerves.

Chemical sympathectomy puts all of the body’s neurons at risk, which causes unintended nerve damage to the tissue and organs in the area.

Cons of Nerve Burning

The Heat Sink Effect

The effectiveness of thermal ablation is affected by the well-known heat sink effect. The heat produced by the burning process may lessen the effectiveness of cold ablation, allowing tumor growth during subsequent treatments.

Pringle’s method provides a less invasive way to reduce the heat-sink effect when treating a tumor that is close to a significant conduit. However, some patients might need an open laparotomy for this procedure.

Nerve Damage is Irreversible, and Some Patients Are Unable to Drive

After treatment, patients who experience paralysis might never again be able to operate a vehicle due to their loss of feeling. Being unable to drive while recovering can be particularly stressful for young people who already have family responsibilities.

Patients should be informed about nerve-burning side effects prior to surgery so they are aware of any potential risks associated with this kind of therapy.

Nerve Damage the Procedure Cannot Be Used to Treat All Types of Pain

While the majority of neuropathic pain conditions, such as drug overuse syndromes, diabetic neuropathy, and cancer-related nerve pain, can be successfully treated with ablation therapy, it is not always helpful for patients with other types of chronic pain, like back/leg pain or pain trigger points.

Adverse Effects Are Possible

RFA is not without risk, despite having a lower risk of adverse effects than chemical sympathectomy. Patients getting this therapy have reported the following possible negative effects:

• tingling or numbness of the skin where the injection was administered.
• The neck’s glands enlarge.
• Muscle ache.
• headache following the operation.

It is important to note that only 1% to 2% of people in clinical studies reported experiencing these side effects.

Back, Leg, Or Trigger Point Pain Cannot Be Avoided

The anatomical structure of the nerves in the back, legs, and trigger points prevent RFA from effectively treating chronic pain complaints. As a result, those who experience leg or back pain may, if necessary, think about alternative therapies in addition to ablation therapy.

Nerve Ablation Adverse Effects Can Be Extremely Disabling

Some patients have experienced significant side effects after treatment, despite the fact that the majority do not. These risks of nerve burning can be very dangerous because RFA is performed in areas of the body where it might take a long time for emergency medical care to reach patients.

Conclusion of Pros and Cons of Nerve Burning

Surgery known as neuromodulation also referred to as “nerve burning,” is used to treat a wide range of diseases, including cardiac arrhythmias, obesity, and specific types of cancer. Neuroablation is the alternative name for this process.

The FDA hasn’t yet given its blessing for use in the vast majority of applications in the US, though. Before it can be viewed as a viable alternative to conventional open-heart surgery, more research on its efficacy and safety must be conducted.

If your issue isn’t as serious as nerve burning, it’s crucial to seek a doctor’s advice and carefully balance the benefits and drawbacks of nerve burning.

FAQ

Tags: Nerve Burning